Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91746 (ALL)

SWETA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13282/2025 · 2025-09-22

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13282 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.4 as well as Mr. Hare Ram, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer :- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to forthwith ensure payment towards four increments which have been unlawfully withheld by the management alongside benefits towards selection grade and arrears, if need, so arises by way of reasoned speaking order to be passed within stipulated period of time which may be specified by this Hon'ble Court in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of her grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no.4 submit that in case petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghan Shyam, Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjeev Kumar Yadav Sweta Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner may make a fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3-Finance & Accounts Officer based at the office of District Basic Education Officer, Etawah, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2025 Kalp Nath Singh WRIA No. 13282 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad