Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91730 (PAT)

Chunnu Alam @ Chunnu Mian @ Chunna Alam v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./278/2025 · 2025-02-04

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.278 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2023 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Chunnu Alam @ Chunnu Mian @ Chunna Alam Hadish Alam @ Hadish Mian R/o - Bada Tuniya, ward No.11, P.S - manuapool, District - west Champaran, At Present Adress Vill, Bhola Tikuliya Ward No.06, P.S - Chanpatia, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State : Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, informant suspects that co- accused Madan Sah, along with others, committed theft of motorcycle of informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation. No stolen article has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.278 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 2/2 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that this petitioner, along with other accused person, is alleged to have committed theft of motorcycle of informant. It is further submitted that petitioner has also got 21 criminal antecedents out of which 15 cases are of similar nature. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T