Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91726 (ALL)

SUDESH YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32087/2025 · 2025-09-14

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32087 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (SL No.24) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Dutt Kautilya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, and Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for the respondent Greater Noida Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of the parties during the course of the day. 3. The instant writ petition is preferred for a direction commanding respondents to execute the lease deed of Plot No. 316 admeasuring 2082.50 Sq. Metre or to terminate the compromise of exchange. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Greater Noida Authority entered into a compromise for the exchange of land in order to remove the obstacle in construction of road and allotted the land to the petitioners Plot No. 316, but with the reduced area i.e., measuring 2082.50 sq. meters against 3500 sq. meters of Khasra No. 257. The petitioners have approached on several occasions for the execution of Lease of Plot No. 316 in lieu of the exchange of land. All the times file is traveling from one desk to another and even substantial period has now been elapsed, but the execution of exchange has not yet been completed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyavrat Sahai, Sunil Dutt Kautilya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh Sudesh Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) However, subsequently a letter dated 22.05.2025 has been issued by Special Executive Officer (Bhulekh), Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his submission has placed reliance upon the communication dated 22.05.2025, which is also appended as Annexure 6 to the writ petition. He submit that as the petitioner in response to the said communication dated 22.05.2025 has already submitted, the entire papers therefore, a direction be issued to the respondents to execute the lease deed at the earliest. 5. Considering the factual situation no useful purpose will be served either to call for file counter affidavit or to keep the matter pending. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case the petitioner files a detailed reply in response to the communication dated 22.05.2025 within ten days from today, we expect that the Competent Authority shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within further two months. September 15, 2025 Shubham Arya WRIC No. 32087 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad