Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
223/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SALEK CHAND
SH. DEVINDER SINGH KALYAN IRS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Rahil Mahajan,
Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG,
Ms. Avin Kaur Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARKESH MANUJA
Learned counsel representing petitioner has been found entitled for regularization on the post of w.e.f. 01.10.2003.
Learned counsel submits that letter of regular appointment in this regard shall be issued to the petitioner upon creation of diminishing cadre post along with release of all consequential benefits inc period of four weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking by counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands disc However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival o erring/concerned officer would b from his/her own pocket in favour expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
12.12.2024 Tejwinder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: December 12, SALEK CHAND
Versus SH. DEVINDER SINGH KALYAN IRS AND ANR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate for the Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Avin Kaur Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel representing respond petitioner has been found entitled for regularization on the post of
01.10.2003.
Learned counsel for respondent No submits that letter of regular appointment in this regard shall be issued to the petitioner upon creation of diminishing cadre post along with release of all consequential benefits including the arrears of regular pay as well within a period of four weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking by counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3621-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 12, 2024
........Petitioner AND ANR. .....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Haryana. Ms. Avin Kaur Sandhu, Advocate
respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner has been found entitled for regularization on the post of ‘Clerk’ for respondent No.2 further on instructions submits that letter of regular appointment in this regard shall be issued to the petitioner upon creation of diminishing cadre post along with release of all luding the arrears of regular pay as well within a In view of the aforesaid undertaking by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at contempt petition and in that eventuality, the liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs the petitioner towards litigation listing of revival application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) 2024 .2 submits that the ‘Clerk’ further on instructions submits that letter of regular appointment in this regard shall be issued to the petitioner upon creation of diminishing cadre post along with release of all luding the arrears of regular pay as well within a , learned However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at contempt petition and in that eventuality, the as costs the petitioner towards litigation TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.12.16 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document