Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
127
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23900-2025 DECIDED ON:03.09.2025
BHARTU RAM .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENT CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG. Haryana Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate and Ms. Chahat, Ms. Smiksha Hans, Advocates for the respondents.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the impugned reply dated 31.07.2025 (Annex.-P/1) of respondents through counsel, being wrong, non-speaking, illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to take other statutory remedies as per law, if available. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 03.09.2025
JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.09.03 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document