- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52256 CRL.RP No. 1143 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1143 OF 2024 BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU. REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP) AND: 1. R. CHANDRU S/O LATE RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR, AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 051. 2. M. BASAVARAJU, S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52256 CRL.RP No. 1143 of 2024 1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT, CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU - 61 NATIVE BACK TO MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, ARASIKERE TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 125. 3. M. PRABHU, S/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS, SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 03. NATIVE SANTHE GATE EXTENSION, KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R3 - SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 18.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.CC.NO.1335/2021 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PC ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52256 CRL.RP No. 1143 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for petitioner submits matter is squarely covered by decision of this Court in Crl.RP.no.975/2024 and connected matters disposed of on 22.03.2025 remanding matter back to Trial Court for consideration of sanction order given by State and to continue proceedings against accused. 2. Though notice is not served to respondents, it is seen that respondents no.1 and 2 were parties in Crl.RP.no.244/2024 and respondent no.3 was party in Crl.RP.no.475/2024 and were represented by counsel. 3. In view of above submission, following ratio laid down by this Court in Crl.RP.no.975/2024, Revision Petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 22.03.2025 passed in said Revision Petition. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10