Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9170 (RAJ)

KOMAL S/O RAMBHAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3026/2025 · 2025-03-04

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9311] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3026/2025 1. Komal S/o Rambhaj, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Allapura Dhakdan, P.s. Uniara, District Tonk (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Jail Tonk) 2. Buddhiprakash S/o Rambhaj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Allapura Dhakdan, P.s. Uniara, District Tonk (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Jail Tonk) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anmol Dhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP, Mr. Shubham Sharma for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 04/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 269/2024 registered at Police Station Uniara, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 329(3) and 74 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioners and the complainant have arrived at compromise. The accused-petitioners and the complainant are close relatives and the injuries sustained to injured Sobhag at his middle finger, though found to be grievous in nature. The injuries sustained to other injured Ramesh were [2025:RJ-JP:9311] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3026/2025] found to be simple in nature. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 12.02.2025 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that the complainant and the accused-petitioners have arrived at compromise and if the bail application of the accused-petitioners is allowed then the complainant has no objection. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the complainant and the accused- petitioners have arrived at compromise, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely 1. Komal S/o Rambhaj, 2. Buddhiprakash S/o Rambhaj, in connection with FIR No. 269/2024 registered at Police Station Uniara, District Tonk shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/161