Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28691 RPFC No. 51 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 51 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O VARADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KARPEHALLI, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 137. …PETITIONER
(BY SMT. A.S. RENUKA DEVI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SMT. SHARADA W/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, 4TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAVARAIAH GARDEN, THYAGARAJANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 028. …RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO (A) ALLOW THE RIVISION PETITION; (B) SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 28.10.2019 IN CLR.MISC.NO.460/2016, PASSED BY THE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28691 RPFC No. 51 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
The RPFC is of the year 2021. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondent despite sufficient opportunities were granted by this Court.
2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondent, the matter was
directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today.
3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24