Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9167 (RAJ)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE-I) v. KARNI LAL SHARMA

WRES/202/2024 · 2025-03-11

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11283] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 202/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13808/2023 The Executive Engineer (Phe-I), Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. ----Applicant/Petitioner Versus 1. Karni Lal Sharma, Resident Of 474, Katewa Nagar, New Sanganer Road, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam- Heritage, Civil Lines Zone, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dron Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/03/2025 1. For reasons mentioned in the applications(1/2024 & 2/2024) for early listing of the matter, the same are allowed. 2. Instant restoration application has been filed, seeking restoration S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13808/2023, which came to be dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 03.01.2024. 3. Counsel for applicant undertakes to file requisite fresh PF and notices soon after restoration of the writ petition. 4. Taking into consideration reasons mentioned in the application and undertaking of counsel for applicant to file fresh PF [2025:RJ-JP:11283] (2 of 2) [WRES-202/2024] and notices, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application, subject to deposition of cost. 5. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13808/2023 is allowed to be restored to its original number, subject to condition of deposition of a cost of Rs.1,000/- with the Litigants Welfare Fund through Banker’s Cheque/ DD in the name of Registrar General LWFA, Rajasthan High Court within a period of four weeks. Receipt of deposition of cost amount be placed in the file. However, in case of non- deposition of cost amount within the stipulated time period, as directed hereinabove, the restoration application be treated as dismissed. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /57