TRILOKI NATH AND 2 OTHERS v. SRI SANDEEP KUMAR MEENA, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND 7 OTHERS
CAPL/4789/2025 · 2025-09-21
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91664 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91664 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4789 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Chaurasia, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Anil Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. At the very outset, Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite parties submitted that now the order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, present application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the applicants.
3. Under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed.
4. Let the file be consigned to record. September 22, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rakesh Pathak (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Triloki Nath And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) Sri Sandeep Kumar Meena, Superintendent Of Police And 7 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad