- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46214 WP No. 28983 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 28983 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VINAYAKA P S/O PRAKASH RAO AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O NO.3RD MAIN, 12TH CROSS VINOBANAGAR, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT DAVANAGERE-577006. 2. MANJUNATH S S/O SRINIVAS S AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O PAMENAHALLI DAVANAGERE TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577002 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577006. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE EASTERN RANGE DAVANAGERE-577006. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46214 WP No. 28983 of 2025 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577006. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BADAVANE POLICE STATION DAVANAGERE-577006 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDDARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 AND 4 TO IMPLEMENT THE CIRCULAR DATED: 08.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE- A WITHOUT GIVING ANY CONCESSION OR EXEMPTION TO ANY PUBLIC AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order to direct the Respondent No.3 & 4 to implement the Circular dated 08-09-2025 issued by the Respondent No.1 vide Annexure- A without giving any concession or exemption to any public. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46214 WP No. 28983 of 2025 b) Grant such other writs or orders or directions or reliefs as this Hon'ble court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case; and c) Award costs of the writ proceedings; 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 27.10.2025 signed by the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWN In the above matter has become infructuous. Hence the petitioner herein prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the petition as infructuous in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 119