Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91632 (KAR)

SRI. M. LAKSHMISHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20909/2023 · 2025-10-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40784 WP No. 20909 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20909 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M. LAKSHMISHA SRIRAMA SENA KARNATAKA, ORGANIZING SECRETARY OF BANGALORE, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO. 453, 5TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, PANCHASHEELA NAGAR, MUDALAPALYA, BENGALURU -560 072. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH S. HALAWAR, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU -560 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY REP. BY OFFICE INCHARGE OF INFANTORY ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU -560 001. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40784 WP No. 20909 of 2023 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE REP. BY OFFICE INCHARGE OF BANGALORE CENTRAL DIVISION, BENGALURU -560 001. 4. ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE REP. BY OFFICE INCHARGE OF HALASURU GATE, SUB-DIVISION, CUBBONPET MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU -560 002. 5. POLICE INSPECTOR REPRESENTED BY SHO OF SAMPANGIRAMANAGARA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU -560 027. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER FIR AGAINST UDHYANIDHI STALIN FOR VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ALSO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONDUCT ENQUIRY AND TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 FOR VIOLATING THE LAW AND THE GUIDELINES OF HON'BLE APEX COURT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40784 WP No. 20909 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioner. The office objections have not been complied with for the sixth time. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11