- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52783 CRP No. 182 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 182 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI R BABU S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 2. SRI R CHANDRASHEKAR S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING No.373 RAGHAVANPALYA, JP NAGAR 9TH PHASE GOTTIGERE POST UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE – 560 083 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI VARUN JAYKUMAR PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT D K VINODA KUMARI W/O LATE K SHANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 2. SRI SAURAV SANDESH A.S S/O LATE K SHANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT SAI SOUDHA, “SSK NURSERY”, 12TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS JP NAGAR 5TH PHASE Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52783 CRP No. 182 of 2025 BANGALORE – 560 078 3. SRI K VENKATESH S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. SRI K NAGARAJ, S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 5. SMT. K SHAKUNTALA D/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT RAGHAVANAPALYA UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK 6. SRI K. CHENGA REDDY S/O DASARATHA RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.G1, RJR LAGUNA APARTMENT KLV LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR 8TH PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078 7. SRI N JELAN TAJ S/O MOHAMED NOORULLA AGED 46 YEARS NO.2303, SHESHACHALAM MUDALIAR ROAD SAIT COMPOUND BANGARPET, KOLAR-563 114 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V VISWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; NOTICE TO BE ORDERED IN RESPECT OF R3 TO R7) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52783 CRP No. 182 of 2025 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.08.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.6 IN OS.NO.2671/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.6 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioners has filed memo which reads as under: “The petitioner humbly submits as follows: That in the above petition, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the captioned petition, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR