Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9162 (UTT)

GOPAL CHANDRA VANWASSI v. PANKAJ BHATT

CLCON/326/2025 · 2025-08-21

Ravindra Maithani

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 09 CLCON No.326 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard. The petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court that the order dated 19.12.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WPPIL No.167 of 2024, Gopal Chandra Vanwassi and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others (“the first petition”), has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents. On 17.07.2025, the Court had required learned State Counsel to get instructions in the matter. Today, at the very outset, learned State Counsel gives a statement that the order dated 19.12.2024 passed in the first petition, has already been complied with. He has tendered the written instructions received by him for the perusal of the Court. Let it be taken on record. In view of the statement given by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in this contempt petition. It stands disposed of, accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 21.08.2025 RV