HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31106 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.771 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station Khalilabad, District Santkabir Nagar, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 9, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Rai, Anup Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Sanjana And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad