HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30700 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 2. Upon hearing counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed off with the observation, subject to the petitioner applying to respondent no.1 for due endorsement on her license (issued by the State Government), to be permitted to operate/work at the protected monuments, the said respondent may ensure appropriate verification and action on the request of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of compliance made by the petitioner. 3. In case, the endorsement is to be declined to the petitioner, due communication of the reason for refusal of endorsement should be made for the petitioner within the same period. September 25, 2025 NS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Asha .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad