TEJ VIR SINGH TOMAR v. HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY SRINAGAR GARHWAL
WPSB/391/2021 · 2025-07-23
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9160 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9160 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6480-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB/391/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at bar that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
4. In view of the above statement, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.07.2025 23.07.2025
Rajni
RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db4844 8ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d0 1342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4D F4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A1 58A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.07.24 14:58:52 +05'30'
2025:UHC:6480-DB