M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sri Kambham Srinivasa Rao
CMA/1019/2017 · 2025-07-28
Challa Gunaranjan
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9159 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9159 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010100662017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1019 OF 2017 Between:
1. M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office - II, Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam Dist. A.P. ...Petitioner AND
1. Sri Kambham Srinivasa Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, aged 35 years Residint at D.No.1-3/4-11, Four Pillars Center, vidhyadharapuram Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. A.P.
2. Sri Seelam Yedukondalu, S/o Subba Rao, Owner of lorry bearing No. AP 16 TT 7488, Tummapalem Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna Dist. A.P. ...Respondents Appeal Under Section_____against ordersmemorandum of appeal in W.C No.4/2010 on the file of the Authority under Workments Compensation Act, Visakhapatnam and Dy Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam.
2
CGR,J
C.M.A.NO.1019 OF 2017 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 1743 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 395 days in filing the above appeal.
IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CMAMP 1744 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the execution of orders in W.C..No.4/2010 dated:20.6.2016 on the file of the Authority under the Workmens Compensation Act, Visakhapaatnam and Dy.Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam and withdrawal of the deposited amount by the 1st Respondent/Claimant pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: P HARINATH GUPTA Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following
3
CGR,J
C.M.A.NO.1019 OF 2017
JUDGMENT:
None appears for the appellant. Even on earlier occasion i.e., on 22.07.2025, there was no representation for the appellant.
2. As there was no representation for the appellant, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J 29.07.2025 LSP
4
CGR,J
C.M.A.NO.1019 OF 2017 78
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1019 OF 2017
29.07.2025 LSP