ASHU SINGH S/O SHRI MAN SINGH RATHORE v. RAJASTHAN STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION
CW/3836/2024 · 2025-02-18
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7115] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3836/2024 Ashu Singh S/o Shri Man Singh Rathore, R/o Village And Post Rajliya, Via Kuchaman City, District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Information Commission, Jhalana Link Road, Ots Chauraha, Jln Marg, Jaipur Through Its Information Commissioner.
2. State Public Information Officer Cum Deputy Conservator of Forest, Van Bhawan, Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/02/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner.
2. Petitioner has preferred instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, against the judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed by the Rajasthan State Information Commission, Jaipur, dismissing second appeal of petitioner under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
3. Having perused the impugned judgment dated 12.12.2023, it appears that petitioner did not turn up before the Commission in his second appeal, in spite of fact that the information on point No.2 has been delivered to him and information in respect of point Nos.1 and 3 was not available on record. It is clear that the petitioner did not pursue his second appeal on merits before the
[2025:RJ-JP:7115] (2 of 2) [CW-3836/2024] Commission and in that view, assailing the impugned judgment dated 12.12.2023 and invoking the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is sheer misuse of the process of law.
4. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed with cost, however, since the writ petition is being dismissed in absence of the petitioner in limine, this Court is refraining itself to impose the cost.
5. As a result, instant writ petition is devoid of substance and same is hereby dismissed.
6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/30