Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9158 (CAL)

PARTHA SARATHI DUTTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/70/2022 · 2025-08-14

Smita Das De, Sujoy Paul

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11. 14.08.2025 Court No.8 (Tanmoy) WPA (P)/70/2022 PARTHA SARATHI DUTTA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Devajyoti Barman Ms. Sanjukta Basu Mallick …for the petitioner. Mr. Amitabrata Ray, Ld. GP Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee Ms. Munmun Ganguly …for the State. 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State are present. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the case the main relief claimed by the petitioner for establishing of RERA Appellate Tribunal, which has been constituted and the petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation (in short ‘PIL’) has rendered infructuous. 3. Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the State, has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the PIL is dismissed having rendered infructuous. (Sujoy Paul, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)