HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30726 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. By bare perusal of the record, it is transpired that petitioner no. 1 has not attained the age of majority and as such the marriage whatsoever has been solemnized, as mentioned through the pleadings, is not a legal and valid and as such there is hardly any occasion arises in favour of the petitioners for seeking prayer for police protection through the instant petition cannot be exceeded. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed. September 11, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sitaram Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Naseeba Bano And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad