- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40420 CRL.RP No. 855 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 855 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI R.N.MURALIPRASAD S/O R.B.NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT C/O BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, PIN CODE - 562 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRABHUGOUDA B TUMBIGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.M.PRIYALATHA W/O MURALI PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, PIN CODE - 562 105. 2. KUM.NAINIKA D/O MURALI PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS, R/AT C/O MUNIREDDY, BEHIND STADIUM, KELAGINA THOTAGALU, CHICKABALLAPURA, PIN CODE - 562 105. 3. KUM. SARAYU D/O MURALI PRASAD Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40420 CRL.RP No. 855 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS R/AT BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE SIDLAGHATTA TALUK PIN CODE-562 105 RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GAURDIAN MOTHER R1. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.R.VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 06.06.2016 PASSED BY II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA, SITTING AT CHINTAMANI IN CRL.A.NO.5/2016 AND ALSO ORDER DATED 29.08.2015 PASSED BY ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA IN CRL.MISC.NO.167/2013 ON I.A. FILED UNDER SECTION 23 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005, AND ETC., THIS REVISION PETITION IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40420 CRL.RP No. 855 of 2016 ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 06.06.2016 passed by II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura, in Crl.A.no.05/2016 confirming order on application dated 29.08.2015 passed by Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Sidlaghatta, in Crl.Misc.no.167/2013, this revision petition is filed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted, order impugned was order of granting interim maintenance. During pendency of this revision petition, Crl.Misc.no.167/2013 was disposed of finally on 23.01.2020. Even Crl.A.no.5/2016 filed against said order was disposed of and said order is presently challenged in Crl.RP.no.823/2025. In view of above, present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and has filed a memo to that effect. 3. Learned counsel for respondents would not dispute same. 4. Hence, taking memo on record, this revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42