Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2204 OF 2025 Between: Shri Rabi @ Ravi, S/o Late Shri Gnana Sigamani, Male, aged 50 years, 16-19/NA, 4‘^ Cross Street, Saimonnagar, Neendakara-A, Kanyakumari, Nagarcoil, Nagarcoil Industrial Estate, Tamil Nadu - 629004. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The Senior Intelligence Officer, Director of Revenue Intelligence Regional Unit, Rep. by its Spl. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (U/s 528 of BNSS) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Non-Bailable Warrant issued on dated: 30.01.2025 in SC. NDPS. No. 146 of 2019 in F.NO.DRI/HZUA/RU/48/ENQ-02 (INT- 01)/2019 on the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge - Cum - I Additional District Judge - Cum - Special Court for Trial of offence under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam, being in abuse of process of law and Court. 4^ This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.K. Komalan, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1. The Court made the following:
APHC010100952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] *•5. 0?? TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2204/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Rabi @ Ravi AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The Senior Intelligence Officer Counsel for the Petitioner/accused; 1.KKKOMALAN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant;
1.SANTHI CHANDRA(Sr.STANDING COUNSEL FOR DRI AND DGGI) ; The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Santhi Chandra Senior Standing Counsel for DRI and DGGI, appearing for the respondent. The present quash petition is filed seeking to quash the Non-Bailable
2. Warrant issued on 30.01.2025 in SC NDPS No. 146 of 2019. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is arraigned as the 1®' accused and that he could not appear on 30.01.2025 due to a heavy rush in the court corridor, and the petitioner could not hear his
3. 2 name when it was called out by the court attender.
On account of the non-appearance of the petitioner, the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge- Cum-I Additional District Judge-Cum-Special Court for Trial of offence under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam, has issued a Non-Bailable Warrant. It is also submitted that the learned counsel for the petitioner could not
4. appear on 30.01.2025. It is submitted that the matter is posted on 24.03.2025. The petitioner shall file an application for the recall of the warrant before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge-Cum-I Additional District Judge-Cum-Special Court for Trial of offence under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. The learned Sessions Judge shall dispose of the application filed by the petitioner for recall of the warrant in accordance with law. With these observations, this Criminal Petition is disposed off. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ^ SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge - cum - I Additional District Judge - - Special Court for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
3. One CC to the Senior Intelligence Officer, Director of Revenue Intelligence Regional Unit, Rep. Special Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
4. One CC to Sri K K Komalan, Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to Sri. Santhi Chandra (Senior Standing Counsel for DRI and DGGI) [OPUC]
6. Three CD Copies cum sree
r HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.2204 of 2025 21 MAK 2025 . Current Section DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION