Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91538 (ALL)

ARVIND v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/8026/2025 · 2025-10-06

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8026 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred against the order dated 04.06.2025 passed by Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Rampur in Special Case No.39 of 2021 arising out of Case Crime No.393 of 2021, under Sections 420, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) da, 3(1) dha, 3(2) VA of SC/ST Act, Police Station Swar, District Rampur. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there are various inconsistencies in the statement of the prosecution witnesses which has not been taken into consideration. The trial court at the time of termination of quantum of punishment has also not given any reason. The sentence awarded by the trial court is based on surmises and conjectures as well as inadequate and disproportionate to the gravity of the offence, hence, prays for enhancement of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State, on the other hand, submits that the trial court, after due appreciation of evidence and circumstances, has passed a reasoned and justified order, warranting no interference by this Court. 5. Having considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record, this Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order of sentence passed by the trial court. The trial court has assigned cogent reasons for awarding the sentence, and the same does not call for any Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anand Kumar, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arvind .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) interference by this Court. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed. 7. The impugned judgment and order of sentence passed by the learned trial court is hereby affirmed. October 7, 2025 Ajeet CRLA No. 8026 of 2025 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad