- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36085 WP No. 27641 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 27641 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAVEEN G. S/O GIRISH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O NO.358, 2ND CROSS 1ST FLOOR, JAI HANUMAN NAGAR ARKAERA, BANNERGHATTA BENGALRU-560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.V.PRAVEEN GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE NOW: GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY HUDSON ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER REG. OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, BSNL CACT DOORAVANINAGARA, KRISHNARAJAPURAM BENGALURU-560 016. 3. PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY (PESO) REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36085 WP No. 27641 of 2025 REG OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, CITY CENTER OPP HOTEL ROOPA, BALMATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 575 001. 4. SRI.HONNE GOWDA H. S/O SRI. HONNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.394, 12TH CROSS 5TH MAIN ROAD, WEST OF CHORD ROAD 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU-560 086. 5. SRI.VIJENDRA WODEYAR S/O SRI.R.REVANAIAH WODEYAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.23, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS SRIKANTAN LAYOUT, HIGH GROUNDS BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-A1 LEGAL NOTICE DATED 18.07.2025, THE REPRESENTATION / MEMORANDUM BY THE PETITIONER BY REMOVING THE UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT ANY PLAN SANCTION WITH RESPECT TO BUILDING IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36085 WP No. 27641 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER What is tried to be espoused in the instant writ petition is a matter of public interest. It is noticed that the private right of the petitioner has not been violated by the actions of the respondents. For that reason, the writ petition is hereby dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation in the manner known to law. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21