Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91529 (KAR)

SMT. SUSHEELAMMA v. SRI ANKARAJ

RFA/1449/2012 · 2025-11-27

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50309 RFA No. 1449 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1449 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O SRI VENKATATREDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22, 5TH CROSS 12TH JMAIN, R.V. BLOCK, SRINAGAR BANGALORE-560 050. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE AND SRI. G.H. ARUN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. ANKARAJ S/O SRI. CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1188, 4TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN ROAD R.V. BLOCK, SRINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 050. 2. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O SRI. SURESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22, 5TH CROSS 12TH MAIN, R.V. BLOCK, SRINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 050. 3. SRI SURESH S/O LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50309 RFA No. 1449 of 2012 RESIDING AT NO.22, 5TH CROSS 12TH MAIN, R.V. BLOCK, SRINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 050. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.B. CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE FOR LR'S OF R1; R2 AND R3 SERVED) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 9.8.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5633/2009 ON THE FILE OF XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Court notice issued to the appellant returned with an endorsement ‘no such appellant is found in the address mentioned’. As such, left with no alternative, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9