HARKESH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER
NA528/33323/2025 · 2025-09-17
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91529 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91529 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33323 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, as per instructions received from his client, has made a statement at Bar that though the present application has been preferred to quash the order dated 10.04.2025 passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bulandshahr and the order dated 18.07.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr in Criminal Revision No. 218 of 2024 (Harkesh Sharma v. State of U.P. and another), Compliant No. 1374 of 2021 (Harkesh v. Pramod), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Salempur, District Bulandshahr pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bulandshahr, but he confines his relief for a direction to the Court below to undertake the exercise as stipulated in the order dated 10.04.2025, as affirmed on 18.07.2025 within time bound period so as to enable the disposal of the proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, as per the mandate contained under sub- Section (3) of Section 143 of the N.I. Act, and further unnecessary adjournments may not be granted, and in case there to be granted, the same should be in exceptional circumstances.
2. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. September 18, 2025 Vijay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Mishra, Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Harkesh Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At Lucknow And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad