ANOOP KUMAR v. U.P. REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/30939/2025 · 2025-10-07
Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30939 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Shri Arun Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that cause of filing the writ petition no more survives and the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. This order is passed with due assistance of Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
October 8, 2025 RKP Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Mishra, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Kumar Dubey, Durlabh Kumar Pandey, Harshit Pandey, Mohd. Afzal, Rajesh Chandra Dwivedi (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Anoop Kumar .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad