Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9150 (UTT)

SANJEEV RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1193/2025 · 2025-07-22

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 54 WPSS No.1193 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gulshan Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the selection grade and promotional pay scale to the petitioner by counting his service from initiate date of appointment including the service rendered by him before the institution was grant- in-aid, as per the government order dated 12.07.2002 (contained in Annexure No.3 to this writ petiton). ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the arrears of difference of selection grade and promotional pay scale to the petitioner. iii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case. iv. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy is squarely covered by the judgment dated 27.03.2017, passed by this Court in WPSS No.1955 of 2015, Munendra Singh Rana and Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others; and connected cases. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 27.03.2017, passed by this Court WPSS No.1955 of 2015, Munendra Singh Rana and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 22.07.2025 RV