2025:UHC:922 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3091 of 2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. There is no representation for the respondents. 3. Petitioner has challenged an interlocutory order passed in execution proceedings. 4. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners (decree holders) submits that the decree has now been executed and possession of the property in dispute has also been handed over to the decree holders. Thus, he submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.02.2025 Navin 2025:UHC:922