Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91498 (KAR)

KARTHIK @ ULALU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/757/2023 · 2025-11-13

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46268 CRL.RP No. 757 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 757 OF 2023 BETWEEN: KARTHIK @ ULALU KARTHIK, S/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1169, SHANI MAHATMA, TEMPLE ROAD, ULALLU, UPANAGARA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 056. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAM SINGH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY POLICE INSPECTOR JNANABHARATHI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 560 056. REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE SPECIAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BENGALURU WEST DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT - STATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2023 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST DIVISION, BENGALURU IN NO.03/MAG/EXTERNMENT/2023 THEREBY DIRECTING EXTERNMENT OF THE PETITIONER U/S 55 OF THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR I.E. FROM 26.04.2023 TO 26.04.2024. Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46268 CRL.RP No. 757 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 26.04.2023 bearing no.03/ JAJf/UÀr¥ÁgÀÄ/2023 passed by Special District Magistrate/Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Division, Bengaluru, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Ram Singh K., learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for one year i.e., from 26.04.2023 to 26.04.2024, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent. 3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission. 4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31