Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.322 of 2025 Abhisek Das ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Durga Prasad Dhal -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – U.C.Jena, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 13.01.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records. 3. This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 465/468/471/420/406 of I.P.C. in C.T. Case No.1817 of 2024 of the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar arising out of Infocity P.S. Case No.490 of 2024. 4. It is stated by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the present dispute arises out of a misunderstanding between the employer and the employee. He further contended that the provision of the 41-A of Cr.P.C. has already been complied with in respect of the present Petitioner. He further complained that although the Petitioner is Page 2 of 2. cooperating with the investigation, however, he is being unnecessarily summoned to the police station every now and then. 5. In such view of the matter, there is no apprehension of arrest against the Petitioner. It is further directed that the Arresting Officer shall not unnecessarily harass the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. 7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Anil