Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91484 (PNJ)

PARKASH SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/26093/2022 · 2025-08-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 106+224 Parkash Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Dr. Sumati Jund Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Jasdeep S *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) CM-15574-CWP Notice in the application. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab respondent-State and Accordingly, the present application is allowed and applicant is impleaded as respondent No.5 in the array of parties. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Main Case 1. Learned 22.05.2025, copy whereof has been handed over to lea petitioner, who been released. 2. Learned State counsel, on ins considered and in case within a period of 2 months. 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Disposed of petition be revived, 20.08.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26093 Date of Parkash Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Dr. Sumati Jund, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Jasdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent No.5. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) CWP-2024 Notice in the application. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab State and has no objection in case the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and applicant is impleaded as respondent No.5 in the array of parties. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that PPO has been issued on copy whereof has been handed over to lea who however, states that neither pension nor earned State counsel, on instructions considered and in case, there is no impediment within a period of 2 months. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. However, the petitio revived, in case need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 26093-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. ingh Gill, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of has no objection in case the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and applicant is impleaded as respondent No.5 in the array of parties. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. s that PPO has been issued on copy whereof has been handed over to learned counsel for the neither pension nor other retiral benefits have tructions, submits that matter shall there is no impediment, the due amount shall be released The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. the petitioner would be at liberty to get this ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No accepts notice on behalf of has no objection in case the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and applicant is s that PPO has been issued on rned counsel for the other retiral benefits have l be the due amount shall be released this ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.21 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document