MOHD. JUBER AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/46269/2019 · 2025-04-05
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-46269-2019(O&M) -1- 214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46269-2019(O&M) Date of Decision: 05.04.2025 Mohd. Juber and others …Petitioners vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhand, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 10. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 134 dated 16.10.2024 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 427, 506 of IPC, at Police Station Nuh, District Nuh (Mewat) (Annexure P-1), P.O. order dated 03.09.2019 qua petitioners No.5 and 14 (Annexure P-2) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.09.2019 (Annexure P-3). 2. Vide order dated 29.01.2020, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 26.09.2019 (Annexure P-3). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mewat and got their statements recorded. Report HEMLATA 2025.04.05 02:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-46269-2019(O&M) -2- dated 17.02.2020 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6.
Resultantly, FIR No. 134 dated 16.10.2024 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 427, 506 of IPC, at Police Station Nuh, District Nuh (Mewat) (Annexure P-1), P.O. order dated 03.09.2019 qua petitioners No.5 and 14 (Annexure P-2) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.09.2019 (Annexure P-3) are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 7. Pending application stands also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 05.04.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.04.05 02:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document