- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51595 WP No. 31988 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 31988 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: MR RAVINDRA GATTY, S/O. NARAYANA GATTY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT 22-1/4, ULLAL BAIL ULLAL, D K DISTRICT-575020 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESH N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RENSPRE PRITHESH DSOUZA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER AND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION MANGALURU - 575 001 2. BHAGAVATHI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT JEPPU, MANGALURU - 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3. MR DAYANANDA S/O NARAYANA GATTTY ADULT, R/AT 22-1/4, ULLAL BAIL ULLAL D.K. DISTRICT - 575 020 4. MR PRASHANTH N J S/O NARAYANA GATTY Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51595 WP No. 31988 of 2025 ADULT, R/AT 22-1/4,. ULLAL BAIL ULLAL D.K. DISTRICT - 575 020 5. MR SAGAR MAJOR S/O MANJUNATH R/AT NO. 3-36/8 CHITTIYAR COMPOUND THOKKOTTU PERMANNUR, MANGALURRU-575020 6. MR RAKSHITH MAJOR S/O MADHACVA R/AT NO. 3-24-2, KUMPALA POST KOTEKAR, MANGALURU-575022 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D., NAIK, AGA FOR R1 SRI. KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 R3 & 4 - SD/-) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE ISSUED UNDER FORM 8 RULE 38 (2)(D) OF THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES, 1960 DATED 08-09-2025 IN DECREE NO. 97/2023-24 AND AMALDARI NO. 163/2022-23 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.01 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51595 WP No. 31988 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner has not complied with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 25.10.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to not press the petition. 3. Submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. In view of the dismissal of the main petition interlocutory application do not survive for consideration. Hence, interlocutory application is disposed of. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10