Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91468 (ALL)

KALI CHARAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32683/2025 · 2025-09-23

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32683 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus directing respondent no. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 12.03.2025 within a stipulated period. 2. The representation has been made by the petitioner for payment of his pending dues under a work-contract extended in favour of the petitioner during the financial year 2023-24. It is submitted that the claim is admitted to the respondents. In support of submission, learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on documents annexed with the writ petition. 3. Sri Rajiv Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection in case direction is issued for deciding the representation. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the representation dated 12.03.2025 within eight weeks from the date of communication of the instant order along with photocopy of the representation. September 24, 2025 A. Mandhani Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Kali Charan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad