SMT. GAYATRI DEWANGAN v. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
WPC/819/2020 · 2025-06-16
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9146 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9146 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:24883 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 819 of 2020 1 - Smt. Gayatri Dewangan W/o Paras Devangan Aged About 36 Years R/o Shyam Villa, Netaji Subhash Ward, Jagdalpur, Bastar, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh- Proprietor Of M/s. Sugan Petroleum Jagdalpur, A Sole Proprietorship Firm., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited A Government Of India, Enterprises, Through Its General Manager, 17 Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra.,
District
:
Mumbai,
Maharashtra 2 - Senior Regional Manager Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Madina Manjil, 2nd Floor, Medical College Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 3 - General Manager Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 771, Anandpur, Opposite E M Bypass, Calcutta., District : Kolkata, West Bengal 4 - Chief Vigilance Officer Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Petroleum House 17, J. Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra., District : Mumbai,
Maharashtra 5 - Collector (Department Of Food) Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District
:
Bastar(Jagdalpur),
Chhattisgarh 6 - Rajesh Agrawal S/o R.L. Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Sun City, Civil Lines, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Deputy General Manager Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 771, Anandpur, Opposite E M Bypass, Calcutta., District : Kolkata, West Bengal. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. SMT NIRMALA RAO
-2- For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Shri A.A. Laxmidhar, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Lav Sharma, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 17.06.2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous.
2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Nimmi