1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1596 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SRI. G. THIMMAPPA GOWDA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANDIGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK - 562 123, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. … COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAVICHANDRA T C, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. K. R. SRIDHARA S/O. LATE K. Y. RAMANUJAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT MIG-20, K.H.B. COLONY, KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130. ...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.06.2018 PASSED BY III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT RAMANAGARA IN CRL. APPEAL NO.29/2017 AND RESTORE THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.03.2017 PASSED BY ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC OF MAGADI IN C.C.NO.5/2017 AND ALLOW THIS PETITION WITH COSTS IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellant. 2. Even in the afternoon session, there is no representation for the appellant. 3. Vide order dated 31.10.2022, as a last chance, this appeal is posted today for taking necessary steps, with a condition that if needful is not done, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of appeal. 4. However, needful is not done. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for default of not complying with the office objections. Sd/- JUDGE MDS