Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91452 (PAT)

Sushil Kumar Yadav @ Sushil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

C.Misc./193/2025 · 2025-08-06

Arun Kumar Jha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.193 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Sushil Kumar Yadav @ Sushil Yadav s/o Late Gore Yadav Resident of Village- Belouri, P.S.- Sadar Mufassil, District- Purnia 2. Parmanand Ram s/o Bouku Ram Resident of Village- Belouri, P.S.- Sadar Mufassil, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnia 3. The Additional Collector, Purnia 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Sadar, Purnia 5. The Circle Officer, Purnia East, Purnia 6. Janardan Yadav s/o late Mani Lal Yadav resident of village - Belouri, P. S- Sadar Mufasil, Distt- Purnia ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. On repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. Evidently, no application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable against the orders of the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea passed in LD Appeal No. 70/2016. 4. Office has also pointed out that the present civil miscellaneous petition is not maintainable since the matter Patna High Court C.Misc. No.193 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 relates to the civil writ jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. In such view of the matter, the present civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as not maintainable. V.K.Pandey/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U