DINESH CHANDRA MISHRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13094/2025 · 2025-09-24
Manju Rani Chauhan
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13094 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Shashi Kant Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that to release the arrears of family pension of mother of the petitioners from 16.06.1995 to 15.07.2022 along with all consequential benefits, representation has been given before the concerned authorities but so far nothing has been done in this respect.
3. On the basis of instructions, which are taken on record, learned counsel for respondent, District Basic Education Officer- Pilibhit, submits that in view of relevant Government Order dated 17.12.1965 the family pension was to be paid till attainment of 65 years of age and in view of Government Order dated 03.12.1991 the father of petitioners, namely Ram Autar Mishra, was not to be governed according to new pension scheme since he had died earlier, therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief as prayed, however, in case petitioners move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shashi Kant Srivastava Dinesh Chandra Mishra And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.3 within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavors to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Saurabh WRIA No. 13094 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad