HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19642 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 24.08.2025, registered as Case Crime No. 0773 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 308(6) and 318(4) B.N.S. 2023, Police Station - Izzatnagar, District - Bareilly. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that no role has been assigned to the petitioner in the instant F.I.R. It is also submitted that the money has been deposited by the informant in the account of co-accused, Akash. It is also submitted that the instant F.I.R. is nothing but gross misuse of process of law. Since, the petitioner is innocent person and he has not involved in the offence as alleged in the instant F.I.R., therefore, the same may be quashed. 3. Per contra, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there are specific role assigned to the petitioner in the instant F.I.R. It is further submitted that after plain reading of F.I.R., cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner. It is further submitted that during investigation, it has come into picture that the petitioner has involved in three criminal cases and he is the member of a gang, which has involved in Honey Trapping offence. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also taken a gold ring and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh Yadav, Divyansh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohit Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Rs.30,000/- cash. There are also allegations against the petitioner that he has also quarreled with the informant and also threatened him to make his photographs viral. The investigation is still in progress. After plain reading of the F.I.R., cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner, the petitioner has failed to make out any case for quashing the F.I.R. Learned AGA has placed the written instructions along with case diary before the Court and relied on the averments made in paragraph no.12 of instructions, which are quoted as under:- "12- इस ्ऺस्तर में कथन करना है िक िवषयगत अिभयोग में यािचकाकतार् ्षारा कािरत अपराध की गंभीरता के दृि्िगत उसका मा्ऴ िव्याथर् होना महत्वहीन हो जाता है। अ्षेतर कथन करना है िक िवषयगत अिभयोग में यािचकाकतार् सिहत 6 नामजद व 2 अ्ञात ्िि्वयों के िवरु्ध ्ऺ.सू.िर. दजर् करायी गयी थी। आज िदनांक तक सहअिभयु्व गु्डू बंजारा उफर् शकील अहमद अवधेश, आकाश, िमथलेश, हनी उफर् नेहा खान को िगरफ्तार कर न्याियक अिभर्षा में भेजा जा चुका है, िजन्होंने अपने इकबािलया बयान में अिभयोजन कथानक का समथर्न िकया है। यािचकाकतार् लगातार फरार रहते हुए िववेचना में सहयोग नहीं कर रहा है, जोिक उसकी किथत अपराध में संिलप्तता को स्वतः ्ऺमािणत करता है, अब तक की िववेचना के दौरान बयान वादी, बयान गवाहान, इकबािलया बयान िगरफ्तार शुदा सहअिभयु्वगण, िनरी्षण घटनास्थल, सिहत समस्त संकिलत साष्यों के आधार पर यािचकाकतार् ्षारा अन्य सहअिभयु्वगण के साथ िमलकर ्ऺत्यथर् सं0-04 को हनी ्िैप में फं साकर सोने की अंगूठी व 30 हजार रुपये हड़पने मारपीट करते हुए फोटो वायरल करने की धमकी देने व पांच लाख रुपये रंगदारी मांगने का अपराध िकया जाना ्ऺथम दृष््िा पिरलि्षत होता है। जोिक धारा- 318(4)/308(6)/115(2)/127(2) बीएनएस की पिरिध का दण्डनीय अपराध है। िवषयगत अिभयोग में िववेचना अभी ्ऺचिलत है। जोिक पूणर्तयः न्यायोिचत एवं िविध संगत है।" 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Vijay Kumar Rathi, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State, perused the contents made in writ petition and material available on record. 5. After perusing the F.I.R., case diary along with instructions and the material on record, this Court is of the opinion that the allegations made in the F.I.R. discloses a prima facie case against the petitioner. 6. The investigation is still in progress and this Court finds no reason to interfere with the same at this stage. 7. The grounds raised by the petitioner are matters of defence that can be considered during the trial and not at this stage. 8. Taking into consideration the above-said submissions and settled law, CRLP No. 19642 of 2025 2 we do not find any merit in the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 9, 2025 Atul CRLP No. 19642 of 2025 3 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad