SRI. K.G.RAMACHANDRA v. SRI. KOTILINGESHWARASWAMY TEMPLE
RSA/292/2017 · 2025-08-20
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91407 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91407 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32332 RSA No. 292 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.292 OF 2017 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. K.G.RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE K. GOPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O KAMMASANDRA VILALGE, BETHAMANGALA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563116.
2.
SRI. SEETHARAM S/O SRI B. MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O GATTAKAMADENAHALLI VILLAGE MAZARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSON PET HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563112. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V. VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. KOTILINGESHWARASWAMY TEMPLE KAMMASANDRA VILLAGE, BETHAMANGALA HOBLI BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32332 RSA No. 292 of 2017
BY ITS SWAMIJI KAMALA SAMBHAVA @ SAMBASHIVA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI NARASIMHAIAH MATADIPATHI BHOOKAILASA SRI VALMIKI ASHRAMA KAMMASANDRA VILLAGE BETHAMANGALA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 116. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR L FOR C/R, ADVOCATE FOR DECEASED RESPONDENT)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 05.11.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.
26/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF), ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.12.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.179/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE K.G.F.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32332 RSA No. 292 of 2017
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
No representation on behalf of the appellants.
No steps have been taken in respect of the deceased respondent.
Accordingly, the appeal abates.
Consequently, pending I.A.1/2017 does not survive for
consideration.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6