- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36632 RSA No. 89 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHAYAMMA D/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 2. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA D/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 3. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA D/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 4. SMT. SAKAMMA, D/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 5. SMT. MANJULAMMA D/O LATE PARAVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 6. SMT KAMALAMMA D/O LATE PARAVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 7. SMT RENUKAMMA D/O LATE PARAVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 8. SRI VASUDEVA S/O LATE PARAVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36632 RSA No. 89 of 2022 9. SRI. RAMESHA S/O LATE PARAVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KAKARAMANAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B V KRISHNAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHINNAPPA S/O LATE DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS RESIDING AT KAKARAMANAHALLI VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA DIST. 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN, K G CIRCLE, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RANSA VASANTHI D L., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.10.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.06/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.11.2020 PASSED IN LAC.NO.64/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., RAMANAGARA.ALLOWING THE REFERENCE FILED UNDER SEC.30 AND 31 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36632 RSA No. 89 of 2022 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Office objection is with regard to maintainability of the Second Appeal in respect of determination of compensation for the acquired land. 2. Under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, only one appeal is contemplated and not second appeal. 3. Hence the office objection is upheld and appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8