HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10670 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard Sri Rishabh Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, counsel appearing for respondent No. 5. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the revisional order passed by the revisional court allowing the revision against an order passed by the trial court rejecting an application under Section 10 of the C.P.C. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that suit properties in both the suits are different, cause of action is different as well as properties are also not the same. 4. Since the matter has been remanded, without going into the merits as contended by counsel for the petitioner, it is expected that the trial court will decide the application in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the findings recorded by the revisional court. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishabh Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, Ravi Prakash Srivastava (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Vikas Parmar .....Petitioner(s) Kuldeep Yadav And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad