HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10529 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i)Direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad to decide the Original Suit No.1790 of 2024 (Smt. Sumanlata Srivastava Vs. Mangu Yadav and others) alongwith 6C dated 18.12.2024 moved by the petitioner as expeditiously within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Vardhan Tripathi, Ratnesh Kumar Shukla, Sita Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Smt Sumanlata Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Mangu Yadav And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10529 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad