Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9139 (ALL)

NEERAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/5157/2023 · 2025-03-18

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5157 of 2023 Applicant :- Neeraj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Archit Mandhyan,Rishabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arvind Singh Sengar,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the State is present. Sri Arvind Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. 2. The records show that even previously on 14.3.2023, there was no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application. Subsequently on 29.3.2023, the matter was got adjourned by learned counsel for the applicant. Today again, despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application. 4. Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad