Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91383 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/31196/2025 · 2025-09-08

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31196 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged an award dated 15.05.2025 passed by the sole arbitrator in pursuance of loan cum hypothecation agreement dated 15.02.2018 between the petitioner and the respondent-finance company. 2. The remedy of challenging award is provided under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and that too on grounds specified thereunder. 3. As such, no good ground is made out to entertain the present writ petition. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy provided under the Act. September 9, 2025 A. Mandhani Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Saran Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Ram Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad