[2025:RJ-JP:9095] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3032/2025 1. Sunita W/o Amrit, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kyarda Khurd, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindauncity, District Karauli. 2. Suman W/o Padam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kyarda Khurd, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindauncity, District Karauli. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balveer Singh Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/03/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioners, who are having apprehension of arrest in F.I.R. No.170/2024 registered at Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli (Rajasthan) for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 427, 354(B), 451 & 406 of IPC. Investigation is going on for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 326, 427 & 504 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that accused-petitioners are female and have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties and facility of bail has already been granted to the complainant party in cross-case. Counsel submits that [2025:RJ-JP:9095] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3032/2025] injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. Counsel submits that other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 11.02.2025. Custodial interrogation of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned State Counsel opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that cross-cases have been registered between the parties; petitioner are female; nature of injuries; other co-accused have been granted regular bail by this Court; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioners, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli (Rajasthan) in F.I.R. No.170/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- (1) Sunita W/o Amrit & (2) Suman W/o Padam Singh, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- [2025:RJ-JP:9095] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3032/2025] (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /49