Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91372 (KAR)

MRS. SHARMILA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22374/2022 · 2025-11-17

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47071 WP No. 22374 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 22374 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SHARMILA W/O. MR. KISHOR R BHANDARY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS G-2, DOOR NO.4-2-237/26 GROUND FLOOR SAMSKRUTHAM BEJAI BHARATHI NAGAR KODIYAL BAIL VILLAGE MANGALURU-575003 2. MR. KISHOR R BHANDARY S/O. MR. NARAYAN BHANDARY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS G-2, DOOR NO.4-2-237/26 GROUND FLOOR SAMSKRUTHAM BEJAI BHARATHI NAGA KODIYAL BAIL VILLAGE MANGALURU-575003 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI: K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47071 WP No. 22374 of 2022 2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANGALURU SUB-REGISTRAR MANGALURU-575001 3. MANGALURU TALUK PRIMARY CO OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK (NI) SMARANA BHAVANA, JAIL ROAD KODIYAL BAIL MANGALURU-575003 REPRESENTED BY MANAGER (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE ACT 1959) …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT: CHANDINI S., HCGP FOR R1 & 2 SMT: NEERAJA KARANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE DATED 21.10.2022 IN C.E.P NO. 71/2022-23 AND DISPUTE NO.DRP/DIS/20/2021-22 FOR AUCTION TO BE HELD ON 12.12.2022 (ANNEXURE-A AND B) AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the interim order dated 15.11.2022, auction as per auction notice was not held. Under such circumstances, the petition has rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47071 WP No. 22374 of 2022 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that even though as per the interim order, auction notice dated 21.10.2022 was stayed subject to deposit of 25% of the award amount, no such amount was deposited by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly concedes the same. 4. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE *bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24