Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51910-DB WA No. 1411 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO.1411 OF 2023 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.49, 4TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-I KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.39, BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P. V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
N. NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.960,
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51910-DB WA No. 1411 of 2023
1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, HAL III STAGE, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BENGALURU-560 075.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE, (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT), M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R2;
SRI. RAMESH, ADV. FOR R1 V.C.O. DT:25.09.2024 [VAKALAT NOT FILED])
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO i) SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 08.10.2021 PASSED IN WP No.
18415/2021 (LA-KIADB) BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51910-DB WA No. 1411 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
This appeal is filed challenging the
order dated 08.10.2021 passed in W.P.No.18415/2021, wherein the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition by quashing the acquisition proceedings insofar as the property of the petitioner is concerned.
2. It is noticed that this Court, vide order dated 06.11.2025 in WA No.858/2025 and connected appeals, considered the rival contentions and dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants herein. This appeal also arises from the same Preliminary Notification.
3. In view of the aforesaid order, this appeal is rejected by following the same reasons.
Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37